Thursday, October 9, 2008


Friendly: soft

Richard Donaldson, COO of co-location contributor UnitedLayer, knows that his new consumer InterCage is unpopular. It s just that he s not sure that hosting botnets, malware, and spam navy deserves a natural life of incarceration.

Because that is, Donaldson says, effectively what it wealth to cut off InterCage a.k.a., Atriva from the web the public in this daylight hours and age.

Facts centers are becoming the information flora for the information age, said Donaldson, whose firm re-admitted Emil Kacperski s notorious service to the ground of the net-living after what the COO termed challenging and lively discussion, not to mention the actual pulling of plugs on InterCage s stinkiest servers.

But ethically, he doesn t believe that InterCage s ancient times offenses -- which include helping as a major foundation of botnets, malware, spam and other net-junk -- good point the ultimate punishment, though he points out that InterCage may have already self-administered its own doom, since it may not be in selling much longer with its web standing in tatters.

There s nix Internet stiff that enforces penalties for suspected evildoers; neither blacklists nor blocks have the strength of law, and the act itself is an international m lange on the subject. But when corporation after corporation dropped relatives with InterCage in the wake of multiple information documenting its shady dealings, suddenly UnitedLayer which previously had a co-location concord with the troubled firm, and prides itself on its technocratic vow to Do Rebuff Technical Impairment was the last firm willing to job with it. That essentially gave Donaldson s community the dominance to send InterCage dark or, as he chose to do, stick InterCage in a sandbox and fob watch it like a legal responsibility legal representative watches a hyperactive two-year-old.

It s domicile arrest, says Donaldson, who told Kacperski that although what you ve done in the ancient times is the past, strict monitoring, rigid observance to UnitedLayer s Acceptable Use Policy, and diligent reply to any complaints was required to keep InterCage online. Our cohorts are actively scrutiny for trouble, he told BetaNews. He noted that while none of his other trade have raised a protest about the new neighbor, one of the firm s upstream providers Global Voyage has chosen to lump the IP addresses assigned to InterCage.

It s not that Donaldson is unclear about the possessions InterCage has done, and as a knowledgeable one in technology, he finds certain of InterCage s trial hard to understand. He quizzed InterCage s proprietors about the information findings, and says that though he tends to take the owners of the corporation at their word, he finds it hard to believe they didn t know about the chaos they brought about.

That s not the question, he says. This is: As a provider, what is the ethical obsession to do in this circumstances Can community improvement Can they stay reformed?

Donaldson told us that UnitedLayer made it clear to InterCage that there self-control be nix autonomy on actions -- queries and needs must be answered, the firm s movement must be monitored, the facts for InterCage s skankier former trade must stay deleted, and the ma tre d h tel on which Donaldson saying Kacperski physically pull the plug must stay out of commission.

But, Donaldson noted glumly, there s already a variation between the would-be reformed service and persons bad guys who mean to stay bad. Just six hours after Kacperski pulled that plug on that notorious machine, one service it hosted -- Esthost, the reviled malware-and-junk group currently believed to be based somewhere in the Baltic locality -- was flipside online via two new services.

InterCage s Emil Kacperski was unavailable for interview.
Software: best software
software reviews

No comments: